Theme Parks or Amusement Parks for Six Flags?
“It has to be about the experience, not just the rides.” - Mark Shapiro, new CEO, Six Flags Inc.
Though on a much smaller scale, it was one of those moments like the Challenger accident that jolt you, imprinting in your memory where you were and what you were doing when you heard the news. In my case, I was with my son last September, on our way to seeing the Astros play the Florida Marlins, when the report came over the radio. Six Flags Astroworld was going to be shut down and the land sold for redevelopment.
Now real estate development and redevelopment has long been, together with the energy industry, the lifeblood of the Houston economy, but this time it didn’t seem like good news. I was about 5 years old when the park first opened, and as a child I loved it. Perhaps even more than the rides, I was fascinated by the original world theme of Astroworld, where it was divided into sections resembling the American west, the Orient, the Alps, an old-style main street, etc.
Before the park became crowded with rides, there was a sizable “lagoon” that helped to divide the areas, but unlike EPCOT’s simple circular layout with a lake in the middle, the sections had been carefully designed (as at Disneyland, etc.) to hide much of the other parts and transition seamlessly so you felt more like you were immersed in a single section at a time (this was much easier before the rides got so much bigger).
In essence, the theme park design allowed a visitor (especially a small child who was likely to be overwhelmed with all the inputs) to feel like they were in a certain place in the world, and then a few minutes later to experience a whole different environment (except for the humidity). My favorite ride was an alpine sleigh ride, a mild roller-coaster type experience that went through a sizable manmade mountain which was very cold. Besides impacting even temperature and humidity, the ride gave a child a trip to the mountains, something far outside the Houston experience (Colorado has become something of a Texas colony for this reason).
After a decade or so, the world theme design began to break down. A new roller coaster was built and a large arcade area put in, which perhaps generated a lot of revenue but really didn’t fit (and was pretty tacky). Every year a new ride would be built to use as a selling point to draw people back, and so the lagoon and other open spaces were used up, and the mountain was torn out as well (I suspect the sleigh ride was a considerable maintenance hassle). The park became increasingly crowded with rides and people (since there was less open space) and over the years basically transitioned from a theme park to an amusement park.
Nevertheless, a trip to Astroworld could still be a lot of fun, and with the many fairly new rides and crowds, I think most people were surprised that it closed. As far as I could tell, there wasn’t any warning, and I wonder why city leaders (apparently) didn’t make much effort to hold on to it (to be fair, the news came just weeks after Katrina, and they certainly had their hands - and the Astrodome - full). I was glad I’d taken our large family the year before, the only time we all went together.
Well, I’m still upset that Astroworld has closed, but at least now, thanks to Business Week, I know who to blame. But maybe all will be forgiven if new Chairman Dan Snyder and new CEO Mark Shapiro (from ESPN) do what the article says they’re setting out to do. Rather than focussing just on the rides, they seem to realize the need to emphasize the experience. In other words, theme parks, not simply amusement parks.
One would think the chance to remake dozens of parks would be more exciting than running a sports network or the Washington Redskins (Snyder’s other business). Each park is its own little world, and building and exploring worlds are activities that fascinate a lot of people (see the cover story for the May 1st BW for more on that).
Considering the following three points, I can’t help but wonder if the problem with parks today is that, like Astroworld, they’ve morphed from Walt Disney’s vision of theme parks into simple amusement parks:
1. Customer experience management has become all the rage in marketing. Customers today are buying an experience, not just a product or service.
2. People are overworked and overstressed. When they get a chance to take a break, they are going to want to be in a whole different place doing something totally different than their normal routine, but without a lot of hassles.
3. Fuel and travel costs are up, and many are likely to stay closer to home on their vacations, and these breaks are tending to be shorter but more frequent. Relatively few Americans routinely take long vacations nowadays.
With all this in mind, it would seem that there would be a business opportunity for theme parks catering to folks needing a simple way to take a break and spend time with their family. I hope the folks at Six Flags actually do invest more in the experience and less on giant roller coasters.
A lot more effort needs to be put into design and creativity, and the hassles need to be ironed out and guests given things to do besides just standing in long lines for big attractions. Parks need to be fun, relaxing places for adults and places of wonder for kids.
And by the way, Messrs. Snyder and Shapiro, if you do work out a good formula for a modern theme park, it would be nice of you to try it out here in the Houston area.

You’re absolutely right that a theme park is more about the experience than just the rides. As a kid, all I cared about was how big and fast the roller coasters were. Now, as an adult, I’m more interested in the overall feel and presentation. I’ve never been to Astroworld, but there is a Six Flags park by my home that could also use a little work. Thanks for a great post!
Comment by panasianbiz — May 5, 2006 @ 10:50 pm
I got the impression from the Business Week article that a lot of the Six Flags parks are getting pretty run down. I really don’t know, but Astroworld seemed to be in pretty good shape and I think that’s one of the things that made it such a shock to learn of the sudden closing.
The original huge development on both sides of Loop 610, south of downtown Houston, was known as Astrodomain. It included Astroworld on the south side of the freeway, a bridge and tram service across the freeway, the Astrodome and its huge parking lot on the north side, and the large Astroworld hotel west of the Dome. To the east was the Astrohall and Astroarena, a sizable convention facility.
In recent years, the hotel has been through multiple owners and reportedly is about to be renovated. Reliant Stadium, a very nice facility for the NFL Texans, has been built next to the Dome. The Astrohall has been replaced by Reliant Center, which is on the new rail line to downtown.
One of the sticking points that reportedly led to closure of Astroworld was parking. The lots seem huge, but I guess isn’t if a lot of venues are in use at the same time.
The whole Astrodomain complex seems on the verge of renewal, if a good use for the Dome can be found (I think Houstonians would hate to see it torn down). The best idea so far was an indoor space-themed amusement park that could be open year-round. That seemed pretty neat and innovative to me, but apparently the idea has been dropped.
Comment by Gordon R. Vaughan — May 7, 2006 @ 11:35 pm
An interesting Home Depot press release this morning suggests that maybe Six Flags really is willing to think outside the box in order to remake themselves. The two companies have announced an innovative alliance, which will involve Six Flags’ purchasing its supplies and building materials from Home Depot and Home Depot Supply. The stores will also sell tickets to nearby Six Flags parks.
The more creative part, though, involves Home Depot’s using the parks as a way to showcase products, such as Veranda composite decking and “VIVA!(R) SunPatiens(R), a revolutionary, new, inter-specific flower that thrives in full sun and high heat conditions; and long-lasting”.
Home Depot’s influence will also apparently be felt in restroom (an area of specific concern noted in the BW article) and outdoor facilities. The release quotes Six Flags CEO Mark Shapiro: “Six Flags will benefit from this relationship on a number of levels, from sponsorship to preferential pricing for our materials business, to the extensive marketing we’ll receive alongside one of the country’s most respected brands and the grassroots community service aspect that is so crucial to rebuilding the family connection to Six Flags”.
As part of the community service work, the companies “will jointly construct several KaBOOM! playgrounds for kids in cities near Six Flags parks.”
There will also be tie-ins and park appearances from Depot’s NASCAR sponsorship, and kids workshops at certain parks. All in all, it’s an impressive, creative marketing arrangement that may only have scratched the surface of what is possible. It’s good to see that Six Flags management understands they need to reach families as their core customer base and re-connect with their local communities.
Comment by Gordon — May 8, 2006 @ 2:21 pm
The Houston Chronicle is reporting that “The former AstroWorld site on the South Loop is under contract to be sold for $77 million. Owner Six Flags reported the pending sale this week in a first-quarter earnings announcement, but would not say who is buying the former amusement park property. The 104-acre parcel has been cleared of all rides and other structures in anticipation of the sale.”
It must have cost a pretty penny to clear that site, and though I guess many of the rides can be placed elsewhere, considering the park was under continuous development for four decades, $77 million doesn’t seem like much for the improvements, let alone the land.
By the way, it’s not all that obvious what’s the best use for the property. It’s somewhat near to the ever-growing Texas Medical Center, but not that close. One report seemed to suggest residential, but that doesn’t really seem like a good fit, either. The park seemed big, but 104 acres isn’t that much land in a place like Houston. Really, it seems, the ideal use for the land was a theme park.
Comment by Gordon — May 11, 2006 @ 3:49 am